Any scientific study that ignores relevant data or other factors that influence the study is going to arrive at an incomplete or even incorrect conclusion.

It is impossible for science to prove that God definitely does not exist. The closest that science can come to doing this is to attempt to validate theories (such as evolution) that explain our existence without God being a part of the picture. However, what if the supernatural does exist?

Mainstream scientists go with the belief that there is no supernatural. However, if the supernatural does exist, then it becomes an influencing factor. When this influencing factor is ignored in scientific study, the results will either be incomplete or incorrect.

Just because a scientist comes to a conclusion that seems to makes sense and explain things well does not make it correct. As more and more data is uncovered, science has over and over again discovered that previously held findings were incorrect. Just because scientists can come up with a theory like evolution to explain the origins of life without needing a supernatural influence does not mean the theory is correct.

It should be noted that evolution is not science. Evolution is a theory of the origins of life, which many scientists try to validate using scientific study. There are other explanations of our origin as well, which science can also be used to attempt to validate. One of these is found in the Bible and is the account of how God created the world and put life on it.

The truth is that evolution does not explain everything, and there are also holes in the theory. It would be a mistake for anyone to ignore the possibility of the existence of God and the possibility that the Biblical account of creation is true.

Why don’t you take a look at the research of many scientists who believe the Biblical story to be accurate? Some of these scientists only came to believe in God as a result of opening their minds to other possibilities than just evolution and then as a result of studying the data became convinced of the accuracy of the Bible and in the existence of God.

Incidentally, not only does the scientific evidence fit the Biblical account, but the Bible has also proven to be historically and archaeologically correct. Archaeologists who previously denied some of the claims of the Bible have at times been left embarrassed when the evidence was discovered that proved it was correct all along.

---

Further Information

For further information on scientific evidence that supports the Bible, please visit:

https://creation.com/topics

For an article that specifically addresses atheism, evolution and science please visit:

https://creation.com/its-not-science

PLEASE NOTE: We are not affilliated with creation.com or any of its staff. We may not necessarily agree with all their ideas.